Voer een woord of zin in in een taal naar keuze 👆
Taal:
Vertaling en analyse van woorden door kunstmatige intelligentie ChatGPT
Op deze pagina kunt u een gedetailleerde analyse krijgen van een woord of zin, geproduceerd met behulp van de beste kunstmatige intelligentietechnologie tot nu toe:
- hoe het woord wordt gebruikt
- gebruiksfrequentie
- het wordt vaker gebruikt in mondelinge of schriftelijke toespraken
- opties voor woordvertaling
- Gebruiksvoorbeelden (meerdere zinnen met vertaling)
- etymologie
Wat (wie) is ukase - definitie
PROCLAMATION THAT HAS THE FORCE OF LAW
Ukaz; Oukaze; Oekaze; Ukaze; Ukazes
![Council of Ministers of the USSR]], 1964.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Decree of Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union, 15.10.1964 - Alexey Kosygin.jpggarf.jpg?width=200 "Council of Ministers of the USSR]], 1964.")
ukase
n.
edict
to issue a ukase
Ukase
·noun In Russia, a published proclamation or imperial order, having the force of law.
ukase
[ju:'ke?z]
¦ noun
1. (in tsarist Russia) a decree which had the force of law.
2. an arbitrary or peremptory command.
Origin
from Russ. ukaz 'ordinance, edict', from ukazat? 'show, decree'.
Wikipedia
Ukase
In Imperial Russia, a ukase () or ukaz (Russian: указ [ʊˈkas]) was a proclamation of the tsar, government, or a religious leader (patriarch) that had the force of law. "Edict" and "decree" are adequate translations using the terminology and concepts of Roman law.
From the Russian term, the word ukase has entered the English language with the meaning of "any proclamation or decree; an order or regulation of a final or arbitrary nature".
Voorbeelden uit tekstcorpus voor ukase
1. But the president is right in framing his new policy as a ukase to Iraq‘s government: We are buying you time, and not much of it, for you to dash to competence concerning security matters.
2. Bush‘s ukase applies to all traffickers in Iraqi oil –– as long as their loot finds its way, by hook or crook, into the coffers of "United States persons or entities." Bush declares flatly that any "judicial process" launched against these protected entities –– not excluding criminal proceedings for, say, fraud, corruption, extortion, even murder –– "shall be deemed null and void." But what if some rogue nation still clinging to the outmoded principle of law and order tries to take Bush‘s cronies to court?